There’s an old saying made by Wharton alumni: “If it ain’t a big idea, it ain’t a Wharton idea!”

Ok, I totally made that up, but it pretty much captures the spirit of this article from Wharton where direct comparisons are made between the UMPC and a tube of Pringles:

“When Procter & Gamble created Pringles potato chips, the product initially struggled. Once P&G began marketing Pringles as a snack food and not a potato chip alternative, the brand did well. In a similar fashion, Microsoft could create a product category and then find a new market for it.”

To save you any undue pain, here are the key take-aways from the article from my perspective:

  • Wharton people can quote Microsoft press releases well
  • Wharton people really like to reference Gartner research reports
  • Wharton analysis articles like this one would likely do pretty good in 9th grade science essay contests
  • Wharton believes that Microsoft is a manufacturing company completely devoid of any marketing talent *cough* xbox *cough*
  • Wharton supports the conclusion that Microsoft will have to work weekends to be successful

    “Innovation is hard… Apple worked on the iPod night after night. There are 100 ways to do it wrong, but only one or two ways to do it right.”

    Full Disclosure Clause: I was expelled from Wharton after the dean put me on an unsuccessful double-secret probation period. Oh, and for the record, the article does make some good points. Just skip by all of the stuff the Wharton marketing professors say.

    RSS feed | Trackback URI

    Comments »

    No comments yet.

    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI
    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.