<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Samsung UMPC coming soon!</title>
	<link>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/</link>
	<description>Your #1 source for UMPC news, analysis and fun -- with an attitude!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ctitanic</title>
		<link>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1717</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1717</guid>
					<description>I do not have that much information at this moment, but I'll keep an eye on it and I'll post it if I find anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not have that much information at this moment, but I&#8217;ll keep an eye on it and I&#8217;ll post it if I find anything.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1715</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1715</guid>
					<description>I like it, and don't mind the 5" display really.  It would seem that the keyboard would add a bit of heft to it that I'd rather not carry around full-time, though.  Which version of XP does it have?  Is it a true Tablet PC/UMPC?  Is that a touch screen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it, and don&#8217;t mind the 5&#8243; display really.  It would seem that the keyboard would add a bit of heft to it that I&#8217;d rather not carry around full-time, though.  Which version of XP does it have?  Is it a true Tablet PC/UMPC?  Is that a touch screen?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ctitanic</title>
		<link>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1714</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1714</guid>
					<description>To be honest, the CPU does not bother me in this one but the 5 inches display. I have been using two UMPC at 1 GHz and taking in consideration that you are running them at a very small resolution the processor is powerful enough. Via at 1 Ghz is a little bit slow but still usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, the CPU does not bother me in this one but the 5 inches display. I have been using two UMPC at 1 GHz and taking in consideration that you are running them at a very small resolution the processor is powerful enough. Via at 1 Ghz is a little bit slow but still usable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1713</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1713</guid>
					<description>Like the new SA1F00, this one seems a little underpowered in the processor department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the new SA1F00, this one seems a little underpowered in the processor department.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: UMPC Buzz : Oops! Samsung did it again!</title>
		<link>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1712</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ultranauts.com/umpc/p,321/#comment-1712</guid>
					<description>[...] [Via Ultranauts.com]    Published Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:49 AM by ctitanic Filed under UMPC Hardware [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Via Ultranauts.com]    Published Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:49 AM by ctitanic Filed under UMPC Hardware [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
