WidgetBucks - Trend Watch - WidgetBucks.com
A short year ago, we though a UMPC had a 7″ screen, XP Tablet Edition, a touchscreen, the MS touchpack and 800 x 480 native resolution. (So the Sony UX and original OQO didn’t technically count)
Then Vista came out and the Sony UX (5″ screen) and the OQO (no touchscreen, active digitizer only) became UMPC’s. Microsoft marketing declared it so.
By that measure the Fujitsu P1610 and Kohjisha SA1F00 should be UMPC’s.
Based on that, the only distinguishing difference between a Tablet PC and UMPC was screen size. Every other factor had been replicated in either a Tablet PC (Lenovo with a touchscreen) or a UMPC (OQO with active digitizer, screen sizes all over the map). You could get just about every feature in one device or another. For example, screen size is about the only thing that keeps the Motion LS800 from being called a UMPC.
Now the Engadget folks have screwed things up by putting the Fujitsu P1610 and Kohjisha SA1F00 on their list of nominees for 2006 Tablet PC of the Year award, I don’t know what’s a tablet and what’s a UMPC anymore. The rest of the UMPC’s have ended up with the mobile devices. Huh?
I just don’t see buyers trying to decide between a Fujitsu P1610 and a monster Gateway tablet. The decision is more likely to be between a P1610 and an Asus R2H or Samsung Q1P with the core question being “do I really need a keyboard?”.
More importantly, do we really need a separate UMPC category anymore or do we simply need to go back to arguing about slate vs. convertible like we used to? When it comes to tablets and UMPC’s does size matter or is it about what you do with what you have?